Get Your Free Quote
When you fill out this form, we’ll introduce you to your personally selected Learning Advisor with experience in your industry, who will book a meeting with you to discuss your potential project.
There’s no obligation — just mutual fact-finding and information gathering to ensure there is mutual fit and that we can help you. That’s where the conversation starts.
We will get back to you within 3 business hours.
No time works for you? Email venchito@rainmakermastery.com and we’ll arrange a schedule.
Your Team Can't Do It All and Shouldn't Have To
Most L&D teams are running lean. And so you have the expertise to lead training strategy, manage stakeholders, and drive those learning initiatives across the organization. What you don't always have is actually the bandwidth to build everything from scratch - and the project queue that keeps growing.
Content backlog compounds quietly
One delayed eLearning course becomes three. For instance, a new compliance requirement can be introduced while onboarding is still in production. A product update that needs a refreshed module, but the team is already stretched across two other builds. Now the backlog doesn't announce itself - it just accumulates. By the time it's visible to leadership, your team is trying to triage priorities rather than fully executing them, and learners will just wait for training that directly affects their job performance.
Subject matter experts can't carry the build.
Subject matter experts know the content, but they don't know instructional design - and that gap alone will show in the output. So pulling them in to develop storyboards, write scripts, review prototypes, and QA final builds works once, maybe twice. At scale, it will create a bottleneck that will slow production, frustrate your best in-house experts, and produce courses that are informationally dense but behaviorally inert. Information transfer, as we know, is not the same as learning design.
Hiring a full production team isn't always the answer.
A full-time instructional designer, eLearning developer, and LMS administrator will add real headcount costs - plus any onboarding time, benefits, management overhead, and organizational inertia that only comes with permanent hires. So for organizations with cyclical or project-based training demand, that investment will rarely map cleanly to actual output needs. So you end up either being overstaffed during slow periods or still underwater during peak periods.
The work gets outsourced anyway, just not strategically.
When your internal capacity breaks, something gets handed off. And that's not failure - it's a rational response to a real constraint. The problem is when that handoff goes to an eLearning vendor who treats your projects as one of fifty in their production queue: no real discovery needs, no instructional strategy conversation, no ownership of outcomes. So you spend more time just managing the eLearning vendor that you save by using one. So a capable external partner should reduce your cognitive load - it must be, not add to it.
Our eLearning Development Services
We don't ask you to fit your project into our fixed service package. We start every engagement with where you are - raw PowerPoints, a PDF manual, a webinar recording, or just a plain topic - and end with a tested, SCORM-ready course that your LMS can run today. Here's what we build:
Rapid eLearning Development
For teams with a backlog and a deadline, you can send us your existing content - PowerPoint, PDF, Word doc, or a webinar recording - and we return to you with a polished, SCORM-ready course in 3 to 5 weeks. Starting at $1,500 - no complex onboarding, no endless revision cycles, no production bottleneck on your end.
Custom eLearning Development
For corporate training that will need to reflect your organization's specific workflows, compliance requirements, and learner context - not a repurposed template. We handle the end-to-end process: instructional design, visual development, interactivity, and LMS-ready packaging.
ILT to eLearning Conversion
Classroom sessions, facilitator guides, and live webinars all carry real instructional value - but they don't scale quickly. We convert instructor-led content into self-paced digital courses without stripping out what made the original training work.
Microlearning
Short-form modules like videos, interactive scenarios, branding playbooks - that are built for learning in the flow of work. This is effective for performance support, compliance reinforcement, and onboarding touchpoints that don't really demand an hour of seat time.
Instructional Design
Course production without sound instructional design just produces content, not learning. So every eLearning project we craft includes ID methodology from the start - learner analysis, behavioral objectives, assessment alignment - not just as an add-on, but as the foundation for learning.
eLearning Consulting
Not sure what to build first, or whether to build at all. We help L&D teams audit their existing content, prioritize backlog, and define a training roadmap before any single module goes into development.
Built for L&D Teams Who Need More Bandwidth, Not More Meetings
eLearning Solutions Lab works best as a direct extension of your existing L&D function - not just an eLearning vendor you have to manage. So if any of the following describes your situation, we're the right team for you.
You're an L&D manager with a growing content backlog
Your L&D team knows what needs to get built - strategy is clear, stakeholders are aligned, and source content exists - but just the production keeps getting pushed, given that there aren't enough hours in the day. So you need a development partner who can take a brief and execute it well without requiring constant hand-holding through every revision cycle.
You're an HR leader responsible for training outcomes, not just training completion.
Compliance checkboxes and completion reports don't just tell you whether your people actually learned anything or changed how they work. So you need eLearning courses that are built with real instructional design behind them - not just slides with a quiz added at the end - and a partner who truly understands the difference between content delivery and behavioral change.
You're a training coordinator managing multiple projects with no in-house developer.
You're actually the bridge between leadership priorities and actual course production. So that means you're writing briefs, chasing SME feedback, managing timelines, and trying to QA the output - all without a dedicated development team reporting to you. So, a capable external partner can reduce that load, not just add a new layer of project management.
You're leading training at a mid-size US organization scaling faster than your team.
Headcount is growing - and so are new roles, new markets, and new compliance requirements. And the training demand is outpacing what your current team can produce in-house - and hiring a full production team isn't justified by the volume yet. So outsourcing specific builds to an eLearning partner who operates at your standards is the rational answer.
Built for Industries Where Training Compliance, Accuracy, and Speed All Matter
We build eLearning courses for organizations where getting training programs wrong isn't just an efficiency issue - it's a liability for the company. So if your industry just carries real compliance stakes, onboarding complexity, or workforce scale, here's what we truly understand about your training environment before any kickoff call.
Sales Training
Sales training has a shelf-life problem: product lines change, messaging evolves, and competitive positioning just shifts faster than most L&D teams can update their content library. So we build a module, updatable sales online training that will cover product knowledge, objection handling, and consultative selling skills - that are all designed to be maintained without a full rebuild every time the offer changes. And so existing playbook, call recordings, and sales decks will convert clearly into structured, trackable courses that are under our Rapid eLearning Development model.
Compliance Training
Compliance training is just the category most likely to be built fast, built cheap, and built wrong, which is exactly a scenario that creates the liability exposure rather than reducing it. So a module that gets clicked through without genuine knowledge transfer doesn't truly protect your organization - it only produces a completion record. So we build compliance eLearning with scenario-based decision-making, branching logic, and assessment structures that will require demonstrated understanding before any learner is marked certified.
Onboarding
Onboarding any content ages faster than any other training category. Like role expectations shift, tools change, org structures evolve - and most of the onboarding libraries will reflect how the organization worked two years ago, not today. So we build onboarding eLearning that is modular by design: role-specific paths, updatable without full rebuilds, and structured to get new hires to proficiency faster than any live session schedule allows.
Leadership Development
Leadership development is one of the hardest training categories to truly convert into eLearning effectively, given that skills involved are behavioral, contextual, and resistant to any passive content delivery. So we built leadership eLearning with scenario-based learning at its core: realistic decision points, consequence branching, and reflection prompts that will create cognitive friction necessary for any behavioral skill development. Not any slide deck with just a quiz - a truly good experience that asks something of the learner.
How We Build - From Raw Content to LMS-Ready Course
No complex onboarding - no ambiguous timelines - so here's exactly what will happen from the moment you send us your content to the day your course goes live in your LMS:
STEP 1
Send Your Content - Day 1
You don't need a finished storyboard or a production-ready script. You send us whatever you have - a PowerPoint deck, a PDF manual, a Word doc, a webinar recording, or just a topic outline. We work from raw source materials, and if your content is reasonably complete, this is all we need to scope the project and move forward.
STEP 2
Discovery Call - Week 1
A focused 30-minute kickoff with our Learning Advisor. So we align on four things: our learner profile, the behavior or skill the course needs to produce, your LMS environment, SCORM requirements, and your timeline. So this call is where instructional intent gets locked in - before any single screen is built. Everything downstream depends on getting this right.
STEP 3
Instructional Design & Storyboarding - Week 1–2
Our instructional designers will translate your source content into a learning architecture - sequence pacing, interaction points, and assessment strategy. So you receive a storyboard for review before any development begins. Now this is your first checkpoint: the moment to push back on structure, scope, or approach before any production investment is actually made.
STEP 4
Course Development - Week 2–4
With the storyboard that gets approved, our development team will build the full course - interactions, visuals, voiceover integration, quiz logic, and branching are all specified. So you receive a second review checkpoint mid-build. Now, the feedback at this stage is scoped to content accuracy and interaction behavior - not structural changes, which is why Step 3 really matters.
STEP 5
QA, Accessibility, and SCORM Packaging - Week 4–5
Before anything is delivered, our courses will go through internal QA: functionality testing across browsers, WCAG 2.1 AA accessibility compliance, and SCORM 1.2, SCORM 2004, or xAPI packaging will depend on your LMS. So you don't receive just a file and then find out it breaks on upload.
STEP 6
Delivery and Launch Support - Week 5
You will receive a tested, LMS-ready SCORM package with upload instructions specific to your platform. So any issues that will surface post-upload, like a tracking anomaly, a completion trigger that isn't firing - we resolve them. So the project isn't closed until the eLearning course is running correctly in your environment.
Yes, We're Philippines-Based. Here's Why That Works in Your Favor.
Outsourcing eLearning development isn't a compromise. For any US organization that can manage lean L&D teams, growing content backlogs, and fixed training budgets, it's truly a deliberate operational decision. So here's what makes the Philippines, the right outsourcing destination for corporate eLearning - and what separates eLearning Solutions Lab from the broader market.
English is a working language, not a translation layer.
The Philippines is one of the few countries where English functions as a genuine working language - that is, used in schools, business, government, and media. For eLearning development, this matters beyond grammar. Our instructional designers will read your brief the way you wrote it, write scripts that will sound natural to your US learners, and catch tone and context issues that a non-native team would miss. So you're not reviewing output that was written in one language and adapted into another.
Your budget goes further without sacrificing quality.
You know that a US-based agency will charge US-based overhead: office costs, benefits, and salaries that are all benchmarked to American labor markets - all of course will pass directly to you as a client. Philippine-based eLearning development will operate at a significantly lower cost structure. So your $1,500 Rapid Build or $2,499 Standard Build is priced at a point that most US agencies can't truly match without cutting corners on instructional quality. So, same learning design methodology, same SCORM compliance, same WCAG accessibility standard - all that is priced where the work is built, not where your learners reside.
The talent pool is deep and specialized.
Corporate eLearning development has been a growth sector in the Philippines for over a decade, and it has been producing a large pool of instructional designers, eLearning developers, and LMS specialists with direct experience helping US corporate audiences. At eLearning Solutions Lab, every project is staffed with designers who have actually built specifically for the compliance, onboarding, sales training, and leadership development use cases your team runs.
The process is built to make time zone irrelevant.
Of course, there's a time zone difference, and we won't pretend otherwise. What we will tell you is that our development process is structured so that the gap never becomes a project management problem. Review checkpoints, for instance, are scheduled in advance. Feedback windows are defined beforehand. Your Learning Advisor will respond within one business day. So that projects don't just run into timeline trouble given time zones, they run into trouble given an unclear process. Ours is documented across six steps before any development begins.
The risk is a vendor selection problem, not a geography problem.
The legitimate concern, we know, L&D buyers have about outsourcing isn't really about the Philippines itself, but rather about handling a project to an eLearning vendor who can treat their production order with no instructional accountability. So that risk alone exists with domestic vendors, too. What will be eliminated is process transparency, published pricing, structured review cycles, and an eLearning partner who can measure success at outcomes - not file delivery. So that's the model we operate on, regardless of where the work is built.
Get Your Free Quote
When you fill out this form, we’ll introduce you to your personally selected Learning Advisor with experience in your industry, who will book a meeting with you to discuss your potential project.
There’s no obligation — just mutual fact-finding and information gathering to ensure there is mutual fit and that we can help you. That’s where the conversation starts.
We will get back to you within 3 business hours.
No time works for you? Email venchito@rainmakermastery.com and we’ll arrange a schedule.
Frequently Asked Questions About eLearning Development
It depends on the real-life complexity and seat time of the course, so unlike most eLearning vendors, we publish our pricing. Our Rapid Build courses start at $1,500 for up to 30 minutes of seat time with basic interactivity and one revision round. Standard Build courses run $2,499 for up to 45 minutes with moderate interactivity, custom visuals, and two revision rounds. And for teams with multiple courses, the Professional Build bundle will cover three courses with rich interactivity, branching scenarios, and voiceover at $5,999. No hidden scoping fees, no surprise revision charges outside of what’s included in your tier.
Most eLearning courses are delivered in 3 to 5 weeks from kickoff – including instructional design, development, QA, and SCORM packaging. So that timeline holds across all three of our pricing tiers. Now the main variable is your review turnaround: having faster feedback comes back at each checkpoint – the clearer the timeline stays. And the project with delayed SME feedback or scope changes mid-build takes longer, which is the reason why we lock in our instructional intent during the Week 1 discovery call before any development begins.
Whatever it is that you have – like a PowerPoint deck, a PDF manual, a Word document, a webinar recording, or a topic outline – we only work from raw source materials and handle the instructional design from there. Here, you don’t need a finished storyboard or a production-ready script before you reach out to us. So if your content is reasonably complete, that’s enough to scope and start.
Rapid eLearning takes existing content and converts it into a structured, interactive, SCORM-ready course quickly and cost-effectively. So the source material does most of the instructional heavy lifting, so our team will focus on design, interaction, and packaging. Custom eLearning starts from just a performance goal, not a content asset – and truly builds the learning architecture, scenarios, and interactivity from scratch around your specific learner context and outcomes. Rapid, of course, is much faster and lower cost. Custom is more involved and produces a more tailored learning experience. And so most teams will need both at different points of their eLearning cycles and content roadmap.
Yes, every eLearning course is delivered as a tested SCORM 1.2, SCORM 2004, or xAPI package – all compatible with any modern LMS that includes Cornerstone, Docebo, TalentLMS, Absorb, Moodle, and Workday Learning. We test for LMS compatibility before the delivery and provide upload instructions that are specific to your platform. So if a tracking or competition issue surfaces after the upload, we resolve it before closing the actual project.
It only means that every course we deliver meets the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines at the AA standard – so the benchmark most US organizations and regulated industries will require. In practice, essentially, that includes the screen reader compatibility, keyboard navigation, sufficient color contrast, and accurate closed captions on any audio or video elements. So accessibility isn’t just an add-on tier – it’s included in every build at every price point.
Yes, and it’s often the most efficient way to work through a backlog. So our Professional Build bundle is designed and structured specifically for teams that actually need three or more courses built concurrently, with a dedicated project manager and priority scheduling. And for larger content roadmaps that are beyond three courses, we scope those engagements individually during the consultation.
You will receive a tested, LMS-ready SCORM package with delivery documentation. So post-launch, if there are any technical issues that will surface in your LMS environment – a completion trigger not just firing, a tracking anomaly – we all address them. Ongoing content updates, annual refreshes, or version-controlled revisions for any compliance charges are all available as separate engagements; we’ll discuss what really makes sense for your content during the consultation.